Kierkegaard claims that the only way to make life worthwhile is to embrace faith in God, and that faith necessarily involves embracing the absurd. One has faith in God, but one cannot believe in God.
We believe in things that we can prove, but we can only have faith in things that are beyond our understanding. It makes no sense, though, to say we have faith in gravity, since that would require the possibility that, someday, gravity would fail to materialize. Faith requires uncertainty, and thus we can have faith in God because God is beyond logic, beyond proof, and beyond reason. Repetition and recollection are two contrasting ways of trying to maximize enjoyment.
Repetition serves multiple purposes for Kierkegaard. First, it has an important aesthetic function. People want to repeat particularly enjoyable experiences, but the original pleasure is often lost in the repeating. This is due to the expectation that things will be just the same the second time as the first time.
Repetition can produce powerful feelings but usually only when the experience occurs unplanned.
In this case, the pleasure might even be magnified at the sudden resurgence of happy memories—in other words, the recollection. There is pleasure in planned repetition, but it is a comfortable pleasure, not an exciting one. While repetition offers the joy of anticipation—joy that seldom materializes in the actual event—recollection offers the joy of remembering a particularly happy event.
Often, recalling a pleasant occurrence is more enjoyable than repeating the same event: remembering the Christmases of your childhood is often more pleasant than Christmas is in adulthood. Indeed, much of the pleasure of Christmas, for an older person, can come from nostalgia.
The pleasures of recollection, which are best enjoyed alone, are well suited to the aesthetic life. Unplanned repetition is a truly aesthetic pleasure as well, while planned repletion, such as that represented by marriage, affords more ethical pleasures than aesthetic ones.
How to Cite This SparkNote.
The Pleasures of Repetition and Recollection Repetition and recollection are two contrasting ways of trying to maximize enjoyment. Previous Next.
From the SparkNotes Blog. By Elodie. Volume Issue Aug , pp.
Volume Issue Jul , pp. Volume Issue Dec , pp. Previous Article.
Next Article. Passion as a Will to Existence in Kierkegaard. Abstract Kierkegaard might be aptly called a philosopher of passion due to his enormous emphasis on this concept. About the article Published Online : Published in Print : Related Content Loading General note: By using the comment function on degruyter.
A respectful treatment of one another is important to us.
The path of faith is hard, ripped, a thousand miles an easy and safe. Y plays an essential role of anxiety, that is to say the frenzy of the free individual faced with opportunities and conflicting choices. As a summary, it is capable, and it is all the more man than his anguish is deep.
Similarly, the despair, the internal inconsistency of human synthesis, this slow death of the soul that imbalance, we form there for eternity. We see then, is the school teacher who is suffering.
"The objective of this book is to review the complex of issues in Soren Kierkegaard's concept of existence. It is evident that for Kierkegaard existence is always. The philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard has been a major influence in the development of .. Since the concepts of good and evil did not come into existence before Adam ate the fruit, which is now dubbed original sin, Adam had no concept of.
Thus, far from systematic thinking, Kierkegaard , he designed the painful route of religious individual. That means, in this perspective, the truth? It appears as the objective uncertainty, held in the appropriation of an inner passion.